BONK DAO loses 4.426T BONK worth $21.2M after a token-weighted vote passed using 882.285B BONK quorum power.
BONK DAO is facing review after a governance vote reportedly drained about $21.2 million from its treasury.
The case involves a proposal that moved 4.426 trillion BONK to a wallet controlled by the attacker.
The attacker reportedly spent about $4.4 million buying BONK before the vote. That purchase gave the wallet enough tokens to pass the proposal under the DAO’s rules.
The vote passed Onchain, and the treasury transfer executed automatically. However, legal questions remain because valid blockchain actions can still face court review.
The case has started a wider debate about DAO voting, treasury controls and legal duty. It also shows how low voter turnout can expose community funds.
Attacker Used BONK to Control the Vote
The reported attack began on June 30 through a proposal on BONK DAO’s governance platform.
The proposal requested 4.426 trillion BONK from the treasury. The tokens were set to move into a wallet linked to the attacker.
Someone spent $4.4M to steal $21.2M from the #BONK treasury, making a profit of $16.8M.
How did it happen?👇
➡️ On June 30, the attacker submitted a governance proposal to transfer 4.426T $BONK($21.2M) from the treasury to a wallet he controlled (9bxW…JHvQ).… pic.twitter.com/VElnDuazki
— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) July 7, 2026
Over two days, the attacker bought 882.285 billion BONK on Bybit and Binance.
That amount was above the 879.95 billion BONK quorum needed for the vote. As a result, the wallet gained enough voting power.
The attacker then voted “Yes” using the full BONK balance. The proposal passed after meeting the required voting threshold.
After approval, the DAO system moved the treasury funds automatically.
Treasury Drain Raises DAO Governance Concerns
The incident is unusual because it did not rely on a standard code exploit.
The attacker reportedly followed the governance process and used voting power. Therefore, the system behaved as designed under its own rules.
An attacker just followed every bloody rule of a crypto system ultra perfectly, drained 20 million dollars from its treasury, and may still go to prison for it.
On July 6th 2026, the dude spent about 4 million dollars buying BONK tokens, voted for his own proposal, and the code… pic.twitter.com/6cY6YtrcWX
— Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ (@shanaka86) July 7, 2026
Still, Onchain approval does not settle the legal question. Courts may view the action differently from the blockchain.
A valid vote can still be reviewed as possible self-dealing or fraud. Reports said 40 billion BONK, worth about $188,000, was later sent to OKX.
The remaining 4.386 trillion BONK was held in another wallet. Blockchain watchers are now tracking those funds across related addresses.
Read Also:
Bonk.fun Hack: Domain Breach Triggers Wallet Drainer Warning on Solana Memecoin Platform
Legal Risk Remains After Onchain Approval
The BONK DAO case shows the risk of token-weighted voting with weak participation.
Large holders can control outcomes when few community members vote. This can place treasury assets at risk during low-turnout proposals.
Some DAOs use extra safeguards to reduce this type of threat. These can include time delays, higher quorum levels and multisig reviews.
Emergency pause tools may also slow harmful treasury transfers. The attacker may still face legal action despite the Onchain approval.
BONK DAO has reportedly contacted law enforcement after the treasury movement. For now, exchanges and blockchain analysts continue watching the wallet activity.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.