HomeNewsFrance's Moldova Election Was Allegedly Manipulated Via Telegram

France’s Moldova Election Was Allegedly Manipulated Via Telegram

-

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has just accused French intelligence of seeking political censorship in Moldova’s elections.

 

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has accused French intelligence of trying to use his legal troubles in Paris to pressure him into censoring political voices in Moldova. 

He revealed the allegations in posts shared on Telegram and X, and said that the request came ahead of Moldova’s previous presidential elections.

Telegram Founder Rejects Quid Pro Quo Offer

Durov stated that Telegram initially reviewed a list of channels flagged by French and Moldovan officials. Some channels clearly violated Telegram’s terms of service and were removed. However, he said the second list that arrived later was entirely different.

He explained that most of the channels on the second list were legitimate and fully compliant with Telegram’s rules. 

Their only common trait was that they expressed political views that the French and Moldovan governments reportedly opposed.

“Telegram will not remove content for political reasons,” Durov wrote. 

He added that using his ongoing legal case in France as leverage to push for such censorship was unacceptable.

Moldova’s Election and Broader Political Context

Moldova’s presidential election came amid serious tensions between pro-European and pro-Russian factions. 

President Maia Sandu’s Party of Action and Solidarity led the vote count, while opposition leader Igor Dodon challenged the results and called for protests.

Both Moldovan elections in recent years have been marred by accusations of foreign interference. Besides, Sandu has repeatedly warned of Russian attempts to influence the democratic process. 

Durov’s allegations have now drawn attention to possible Western involvement as well.

Cryptocurrency’s Role in Moldova’s Election Interference

While Durov’s allegations focus on Telegram, the Moldova situation reveals a deeper connection between crypto and election manipulation. Recent investigations have exposed how cryptocurrency became a critical tool for circumventing sanctions and funding political interference.

Ilan Shor, a Moldovan oligarch sanctioned by the US in 2022 for aiding Moscow’s election meddling, established the A7 crypto platform in 2024. The platform processed approximately $8 billion in transactions and created a ruble-backed stablecoin called A7A5 that moved $9.3 billion in just four months.

Leaked texts and on-chain data show that A7 was used to funnel millions in cryptocurrency to Moldovan politicians and activists. One high-profile incident involved Shor sending millions in crypto to at least one former elected official. The payments were made using USDT and Toncoin, highlighting how different cryptocurrencies can be leveraged for political manipulation.

The A7 platform was nearly half-owned by Promsvyazbank, a Russian state-run bank already under sanctions for supporting Russia’s defense sector. This structure allowed the operation to evade traditional financial oversight while maintaining plausible deniability about direct Kremlin involvement.

Both the EU and US have since sanctioned A7 and related entities. However, the incident demonstrates how crypto can be weaponised to interfere in democratic processes while bypassing conventional financial controls.

Durov’s Legal Struggles in France

The controversy unfolded against the backdrop of Durov’s legal troubles in France. French police arrested him in August of last year, and alleged that Telegram had been used for illegal activities, including money laundering and drug trafficking. 

Durov denied the charges and called the detention unprecedented for a tech founder.

Moreover, he was held for four days and then placed under judicial supervision. For months, he had to remain in France and report to the police twice weekly. Since July, he has been allowed to travel for short periods but must return regularly.

French prosecutors have admitted that the case is unlikely to reach trial soon. Meanwhile, Durov continues to accuse authorities of exploiting his legal situation for political aims.

Freedom of Speech vs Political Pressure

Durov’s claims show the ongoing struggle between state interests and digital freedoms. 

Additionally, analysts say that platforms like Telegram are facing increasing pressure from governments to moderate political content in ways that can affect democratic processes.

“Rule-based governance is essential,” said Alex Chandra, a partner at IGNOS Law Alliance. 

“Platforms must clearly distinguish between actual violations of their rules and content that is politically sensitive but compliant.”

Besides, he warned that the legal vulnerabilities of platform executives can be used as leverage by governments looking for concessions. 

Parallel Issues in Crypto and Privacy

The situation is similar to challenges faced by other privacy-focused crypto platforms. Recent prosecutions of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm and the founders of Samourai Wallet have raised issues about how governments pressure tech leaders.

“Both communications platforms and crypto networks face similar tactics of state interference,” Chandra noted. “Once a regulatory approach works in one sector, it may be applied elsewhere.”

This pattern, observers say, shows the need for clear international standards on digital rights.

French Authorities Deny Accusations

France has denied previous accusations by Durov about similar requests involving Romania’s elections. 

The French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs described his earlier claims as unfounded and diversionary. Moeover, the ministry has not yet commented directly on his latest remarks about Moldova.

Meanwhile, the French intelligence agency (DGSE) has acknowledged meeting with Durov in the past but stated that discussions focused on combating terrorism and child exploitation, not political censorship.

FOLLOW US

Most Popular